GABIL Results
- Its performance was comparable with rule/tree learning methods: C4.5, and ID5R.
- The average performance on a set of 12 synthetic problems
was:
- 92.1% accuracy, without AA and DC operators.
- 95.2 accuracy, with AA and DC operators.
- Rule/tree learning methods ranged from 91.2 to 96.6.
José M. Vidal
.
9 of 18