Vidal's libraryTitle: | Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment |
Author: | John D. Sterman |
Journal: | Management Science |
Volume: | 35 |
Number: | 3 |
Pages: | 321--339 |
Year: | 1989 |
Abstract: | Studies in the psychology of individual choice have identified numerous cognitive and other bounds on human rationality, often producing systematic errors and biases. Yet for the most part models of aggregate phenomena in management science and economics are not consistent with such micro-empirical knowledge of individual decision-making. One explanation has been the difficulty of extending the experimental methods used to study individual decisions to aggregate, dynamic settings. This paper reports an experiment on the generation of macrodynamics from microstructure in a common managerial context. Subjects manage a simulated inventory distribution system which contains multiple actors, feedbacks, nonlinearities, and time delays. The interaction of individual decisions with the structure of the simulated firm produces aggregate dynamics which systematically diverge from optimal behavior. An anchoring and adjustment heuristic for stock management is proposed as a model of the subjects' decision processes. Econometric tests show the rule explains the subjects' behavior well. The estimation results identify several `misperceptions of feedback' which account for the poor performance of the subjects. In particular, subjects are shown to be insensitive to the feedbacks from their decisions to the environment. Finally, the generality of the results is considered and implications for behavioral theories of aggregate social and economic dynamics are explored. |
Cited by 557 - Google Scholar
@Article{sterman89a,
author = {John D. Sterman},
title = {Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of
Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment},
journal = {Management Science},
year = 1989,
volume = 35,
number = 3,
pages = {321--339},
abstract = {Studies in the psychology of individual choice have
identified numerous cognitive and other bounds on
human rationality, often producing systematic errors
and biases. Yet for the most part models of
aggregate phenomena in management science and
economics are not consistent with such
micro-empirical knowledge of individual
decision-making. One explanation has been the
difficulty of extending the experimental methods
used to study individual decisions to aggregate,
dynamic settings. This paper reports an experiment
on the generation of macrodynamics from
microstructure in a common managerial
context. Subjects manage a simulated inventory
distribution system which contains multiple actors,
feedbacks, nonlinearities, and time delays. The
interaction of individual decisions with the
structure of the simulated firm produces aggregate
dynamics which systematically diverge from optimal
behavior. An anchoring and adjustment heuristic for
stock management is proposed as a model of the
subjects' decision processes. Econometric tests show
the rule explains the subjects' behavior well. The
estimation results identify several `misperceptions
of feedback' which account for the poor performance
of the subjects. In particular, subjects are shown
to be insensitive to the feedbacks from their
decisions to the environment. Finally, the
generality of the results is considered and
implications for behavioral theories of aggregate
social and economic dynamics are explored.},
url = {http://jmvidal.cse.sc.edu/library/sterman89a.pdf},
keywords = {economics complexity beergame},
cluster = {9864740858624482687}
}
Last modified: Wed Mar 9 10:13:46 EST 2011