Vidal's libraryTitle: | Argumentation-based negotiation |
Author: | Iyad Rahwan, Sarvapali D. Ramchurn, Nicholas R. Jennings, Peter McBurney, Simon Parsons, and Liz Sonenberg |
Journal: | The Knowledge Engineering Review |
Volume: | 18 |
Number: | 4 |
Pages: | 343--375 |
Year: | 2004 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0269888904000098 |
Abstract: | Negotiation is essential in settings where autonomous agents have conflicting interests and a desire to cooperate. For this reason, mechanisms in which agents exchange potential agreements according to various rules of interaction have become very popular in recent years as evident, for example, in the auction and mechanism design community. However, a growing body of research is now emerging which points out limitations in such mechanisms and advocates the idea that agents can increase the likelihood and quality of an agreement by exchanging arguments which influence each others’ states. This community further argues that argument exchange is sometimes essential when various assumptions about agent rationality cannot be satisfied. To this end, in this article, we identify the main research motivations and ambitions behind work in the field. We then provide a conceptual framework through which we outline the core elements and features required by agents engaged in argumentation-based negotiation, as well as the environment that hosts these agents. For each of these elements, we survey and evaluate existing proposed techniques in the literature and highlight the major challenges that need to be addressed if argument-based negotiation research is to reach its full potential. |
Cited by 65 - Google Scholar
@Article{rahwan04a,
author = {Iyad Rahwan and Sarvapali D. Ramchurn and Nicholas
R. Jennings and Peter McBurney and Simon Parsons and
Liz Sonenberg},
title = {Argumentation-based negotiation},
journal = {The Knowledge Engineering Review},
year = 2004,
volume = 18,
number = 4,
pages = {343--375},
abstract = {Negotiation is essential in settings where
autonomous agents have conflicting interests and a
desire to cooperate. For this reason, mechanisms in
which agents exchange potential agreements according
to various rules of interaction have become very
popular in recent years as evident, for example, in
the auction and mechanism design community. However,
a growing body of research is now emerging which
points out limitations in such mechanisms and
advocates the idea that agents can increase the
likelihood and quality of an agreement by exchanging
arguments which influence each others’ states. This
community further argues that argument exchange is
sometimes essential when various assumptions about
agent rationality cannot be satisfied. To this end,
in this article, we identify the main research
motivations and ambitions behind work in the
field. We then provide a conceptual framework
through which we outline the core elements and
features required by agents engaged in
argumentation-based negotiation, as well as the
environment that hosts these agents. For each of
these elements, we survey and evaluate existing
proposed techniques in the literature and highlight
the major challenges that need to be addressed if
argument-based negotiation research is to reach its
full potential.},
url = {http://jmvidal.cse.sc.edu/library/rahwan04a.pdf},
doi = {10.1017/S0269888904000098},
cluster = {14850733498395080480},
keywords = {argumentation negotiation}
}
Last modified: Wed Mar 9 10:16:17 EST 2011