Vidal's libraryTitle: | Role allocation and reallocation in multiagent teams: towards a practical analysis |
Author: | Ranjit Nair, Milind Tambe, and Stacy Marsella |
Book Tittle: | Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems |
Pages: | 552--559 |
Publisher: | ACM Press |
Year: | 2003 |
DOI: | 10.1145/860575.860664 |
Abstract: | Despite the success of the BDI approach to agent teamwork, initial role allocation (i.e. deciding which agents to allocate to key roles in the team) and role reallocation upon failure remain open challenges. What remain missing are analysis techniques to aid human developers in quantitatively comparing different initial role allocations and competing role reallocation algorithms. To remedy this problem, this paper makes three key contributions. First, the paper introduces RMTDP (Role-based Multiagent Team Decision Problem), an extension toMTDP [9], for quantitative evaluations of role allocation and reallocation approaches. Second, the paper illustrates an RMTDP-based methodology for not only comparing two competing algorithms for role reallocation, but also for identifying the types of domains where each algorithm is suboptimal, how much each algorithm can be improved and at what computational cost (complexity). Such algorithmic improvements are identified via a new automated procedure that generates a family of locally optimal policies for comparative evaluations. Third, since there are combinatorially many initial role allocations, evaluating each in RMTDP to identify the best is extremely difficult. Therefore, we introduce methods to exploit task decompositions among subteams to significantly prune the search space of initial role allocations. We present experimental results from two distinct domains. |
Cited by 32 - Google Scholar
@inproceedings{nair03a,
author = {Ranjit Nair and Milind Tambe and Stacy Marsella},
title = {Role allocation and reallocation in multiagent
teams: towards a practical analysis},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the second international joint
conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent
systems},
year = 2003,
pages = {552--559},
location = {Melbourne, Australia},
googleid = {LVN_lsDfU_AJ:scholar.google.com/},
doi = {10.1145/860575.860664},
publisher = {ACM Press},
abstract = {Despite the success of the BDI approach to agent
teamwork, initial role allocation (i.e. deciding
which agents to allocate to key roles in the team)
and role reallocation upon failure remain open
challenges. What remain missing are analysis
techniques to aid human developers in quantitatively
comparing different initial role allocations and
competing role reallocation algorithms. To remedy
this problem, this paper makes three key
contributions. First, the paper introduces RMTDP
(Role-based Multiagent Team Decision Problem), an
extension toMTDP [9], for quantitative evaluations
of role allocation and reallocation
approaches. Second, the paper illustrates an
RMTDP-based methodology for not only comparing two
competing algorithms for role reallocation, but also
for identifying the types of domains where each
algorithm is suboptimal, how much each algorithm can
be improved and at what computational cost
(complexity). Such algorithmic improvements are
identified via a new automated procedure that
generates a family of locally optimal policies for
comparative evaluations. Third, since there are
combinatorially many initial role allocations,
evaluating each in RMTDP to identify the best is
extremely difficult. Therefore, we introduce methods
to exploit task decompositions among subteams to
significantly prune the search space of initial role
allocations. We present experimental results from
two distinct domains.},
keywords = {multiagent bdi coalitions},
url = {http://jmvidal.cse.sc.edu/library/nair03a.pdf},
cluster = {17317431010421330733}
}
Last modified: Wed Mar 9 10:15:49 EST 2011