Vidal's libraryTitle: | Measuring and maximizing customer equity: a critical analysis |
Author: | V. Kumar and Morris George |
Journal: | Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science |
Volume: | 35 |
Number: | 2 |
Pages: | 157--171 |
Year: | 2007 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11747-007-0028-2 |
Abstract: | Customer equity, the asset value of customers, can be measured using different aggregate- and disaggregate-level approaches. The authors compare how customer equity is measured and maximized under various approaches. We find that, in the disaggregate-level approach, customer lifetime value is maximized by implementing customer-level strategies such as optimal resource allocation, purchase sequence analysis and balancing acquisition and retention spending. At the aggregate-level, improving the drivers of customer equity maximizes customer equity. A comparison of different aggregate approaches shows that, while an emphasis on retention is a common feature across approaches, conceptual differences in terms of accounting for existing customers and prospects, acquisition, and the projection period exist across the different approaches. The authors propose a hybrid approach, which addresses the issues and challenges in existing approaches and helps firms to measure and manage customer equity. |
@Article{kumar07a,
author = {V. Kumar and Morris George},
title = {Measuring and maximizing customer equity: a critical
analysis},
journal = {Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science},
year = 2007,
volume = 35,
number = 2,
pages = {157--171},
abstract = {Customer equity, the asset value of customers, can
be measured using different aggregate- and
disaggregate-level approaches. The authors compare
how customer equity is measured and maximized under
various approaches. We find that, in the
disaggregate-level approach, customer lifetime value
is maximized by implementing customer-level
strategies such as optimal resource allocation,
purchase sequence analysis and balancing acquisition
and retention spending. At the aggregate-level,
improving the drivers of customer equity maximizes
customer equity. A comparison of different aggregate
approaches shows that, while an emphasis on
retention is a common feature across approaches,
conceptual differences in terms of accounting for
existing customers and prospects, acquisition, and
the projection period exist across the different
approaches. The authors propose a hybrid approach,
which addresses the issues and challenges in
existing approaches and helps firms to measure and
manage customer equity.},
doi = {10.1007/s11747-007-0028-2}
}
Last modified: Wed Mar 9 10:16:52 EST 2011