Vidal's libraryTitle: | Coordinating Multiple Autonomic Managers to Achieve Specified Power-performance Tradeoffs |
Author: | Jeffrey Kephart, Hoi Chan, Rajarshi Das, David Levine, Gerald Tesauro, Freeman Rawson, and Charles Lefurgy |
Book Tittle: | Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing |
Year: | 2007 |
Abstract: | Getting multiple autonomic managers to work together towards a common goal is a significant architectural and algorithmic challenge, as noted in the ICAC 2006 panel discussion regarding "Can we build effective multi-vendor autonomic systems?" We address this challenge in a real small-scale system that processes web transactions. An administrator uses a utility function to define a set of power and performance objectives. Rather than creating a central controller to manage performance and power simultaneously, we use two existing IBM products, one that manages performance and one that manages power by controlling clock frequency. We demonstrate that, with good architectural and algorithmic choices established through trial and error, the two managers can indeed work together to act in accordance with a flexible set of power-performance objectives and tradeoffs, resulting in power savings of approximately 10%. Key elements of our approach include a |
@InProceedings{kephart07a,
author = {Jeffrey Kephart and Hoi Chan and Rajarshi Das and
David Levine and Gerald Tesauro and Freeman Rawson
and Charles Lefurgy},
title = {Coordinating Multiple Autonomic Managers to Achieve
Specified Power-performance Tradeoffs},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th {IEEE} International
Conference on Autonomic Computing},
year = 2007,
abstract = {Getting multiple autonomic managers to work together
towards a common goal is a significant architectural
and algorithmic challenge, as noted in the ICAC 2006
panel discussion regarding "Can we build effective
multi-vendor autonomic systems?" We address this
challenge in a real small-scale system that
processes web transactions. An administrator uses a
utility function to define a set of power and
performance objectives. Rather than creating a
central controller to manage performance and power
simultaneously, we use two existing IBM products,
one that manages performance and one that manages
power by controlling clock frequency. We demonstrate
that, with good architectural and algorithmic
choices established through trial and error, the two
managers can indeed work together to act in
accordance with a flexible set of power-performance
objectives and tradeoffs, resulting in power savings
of approximately 10\%. Key elements of our approach
include a) a feedback controller that establishes a
power cap (a limit on consumed power) by
manipulating clock frequency and b) reinforcement
learning, which adaptively learns models of the
dependence of performance and power consumption on
workload intensity and the powercap.},
url = {http://jmvidal.cse.sc.edu/library/kephart07a.pdf},
keywords = {autonomic multiagent}
}
Last modified: Wed Mar 9 10:16:47 EST 2011