Vidal's libraryTitle: | Towards and argument interchange format |
Author: | Carlos Chesñevar, Jarred McGinnis, Sanjay Modgil, Iyad Rahwan, Chris Reed, Guillermo Simari, Matthew South, Gerard Vreeswijk, and Steven Willmott |
Journal: | The Knowledge Engineering Review |
Volume: | 21 |
Number: | 4 |
Pages: | 293--316 |
Year: | 2006 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0269888906001044 |
Abstract: | The theory of argumentation is a rich, interdisciplinary area of research straddling the fields of artificial intelligence, philosophy, communication studies, linguistics and psychology. In the last few years, significant progress has been made in understanding the theoretical properties of different argumentation logics. However, one major barrier to the development and practical deployment of argumentation systems is the lack of a shared, agreed notation or `interchange format' for argumentation and arguments. In this paper, we describe a draft specification for an argument interchange format (AIF) intended for representation and exchange of data between various argumentation tools and agent-based applications. It represents a consensus `abstract model' established by researchers across fields of argumentation, artificial intelligence and multi-agent systems1. In its current form, this specification is intended as a starting point for further discussion and elaboration by the community, rather than an attempt at a definitive, all-encompassing model. However, to demonstrate proof of concept, a use case scenario is briefly described. Moreover, three concrete realizations or `reifications' of the abstract model are illustrated. |
@Article{chesnevar06a,
author = {Carlos Ches\~{n}evar and Jarred McGinnis and Sanjay
Modgil and Iyad Rahwan and Chris Reed and Guillermo
Simari and Matthew South and Gerard Vreeswijk and
Steven Willmott},
title = {Towards and argument interchange format},
journal = {The Knowledge Engineering Review},
year = 2006,
volume = 21,
number = 4,
pages = {293--316},
abstract = {The theory of argumentation is a rich,
interdisciplinary area of research straddling the
fields of artificial intelligence, philosophy,
communication studies, linguistics and
psychology. In the last few years, significant
progress has been made in understanding the
theoretical properties of different argumentation
logics. However, one major barrier to the
development and practical deployment of
argumentation systems is the lack of a shared,
agreed notation or `interchange format' for
argumentation and arguments. In this paper, we
describe a draft specification for an argument
interchange format (AIF) intended for representation
and exchange of data between various argumentation
tools and agent-based applications. It represents a
consensus `abstract model' established by
researchers across fields of argumentation,
artificial intelligence and multi-agent systems1. In
its current form, this specification is intended as
a starting point for further discussion and
elaboration by the community, rather than an attempt
at a definitive, all-encompassing model. However, to
demonstrate proof of concept, a use case scenario is
briefly described. Moreover, three concrete
realizations or `reifications' of the abstract model
are illustrated.},
url = {http://jmvidal.cse.sc.edu/library/chesnevar06a.pdf},
doi = {10.1017/S0269888906001044}
}
Last modified: Wed Mar 9 10:16:38 EST 2011